Phillips v. Harris

1931 OK 198, 5 P.2d 757, 148 Okla. 258, 1931 Okla. LEXIS 870
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided April 28, 1931·No. 19931·Published

Opinion

RILEY, J.

In this ease substantially the same state of facts is pleaded as in En-le-te-ke et al. v. W. A. Beasley et al., No. 19939, this day decided, 148 Okla. 255, 298 Pac. 611, with which this case, together with others, is consolidated, except it is alleged that the mother of the allottee is still living and has conveyed the property to other persons through whom the defendants by mesne conveyances claim title.

The judgment is accordingly affirmed.

LESTER, C. J., and HEENER, CULLI-SON, SWINDALL, ANDREWS, McNEILL, and KORNEGAY, JJ., concur. CLARK, V. C. J,, not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Phillips v. Harris, 1931 OK 198, 5 P.2d 757, 148 Okla. 258, 1931 Okla. LEXIS 870 (Okla. 1931).

1931 OK 198 (Phillips v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

White Oak Refining Co. v. Whitehead
1931 OK 357 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1931)
En-Le-Te-Ke v. Beasley
1931 OK 176 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1931)