Phillips v. Goldman
This text of Phillips v. Goldman (Phillips v. Goldman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 7 2025 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
In Re: KEVAN HARRY GILMAN, Debtor, No. 24-2249 D.C. No. 2:22-cv-04450-MWF TAMMY R. PHILLIPS; TAMMY R. Central District of California, PHILLIPS, APLC, Los Angeles Plaintiffs - Appellants, ORDER
v.
AMY L. GOLDMAN,
Defendant - Appellee.
MURGUIA, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that
this case be heard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 40(c)
and Circuit Rule 40-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Phillips v. Goldman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-v-goldman-ca9-2025.