Phillips v. Goldman

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 7, 2025·No. 24-2249·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 7 2025 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In Re: KEVAN HARRY GILMAN, Debtor, No. 24-2249 D.C. No. 2:22-cv-04450-MWF

TAMMY R. PHILLIPS; TAMMY R. Central District of California, PHILLIPS, APLC, Los Angeles

Plaintiffs - Appellants, ORDER

v.

AMY L. GOLDMAN,

Defendant - Appellee.

MURGUIA, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be heard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 40(c)

and Circuit Rule 40-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Phillips v. Goldman, (9th Cir. 2025).

Phillips v. Goldman (Phillips v. Goldman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.