Phillips v. Georgia Development Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Phillips v. Georgia Development Co.

149 S.E. 559, 169 Ga. 44, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 277

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 11, 1929

DocketNo. 6885

StatusPublished

This text of 149 S.E. 559 (Phillips v. Georgia Development Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Phillips v. Georgia Development Co., 149 S.E. 559, 169 Ga. 44, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 277 (Ga. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Russell, C. J.

It appearing from the allegations of the petition, as well as from the terms of the bond for title attached to the petition as an exhibit, that subsequently to the execution of a proposed contract whereby the plaintiff agreed to purchase from the Georgia Development Company, through its agents, a described city lot for the price of $1500, all of which was payable in thirty days, but which the plaintiff did not accept, and on the contrary the plaintiff entered into another and different contract with one Campbell, whereby he agreed to pixrchase the same property from Campbell as an individual for $1400, one half payable in cash and the remainder in two notes each for the sum of $350, no liability under the latter contract attached to the Georgia Development Company; and the court did not err in sustaining a general demurrer striking that company from the suit.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. W. O. Dean, for plaintiff. Green & Michael, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell, C. J.

It appearing from the allegations of the petition, as well as from the terms of the bond for title attached to the petition as an exhibit, that subsequently to the execution of a proposed contract whereby the plaintiff agreed to purchase from the Georgia Development Company, through its agents, a described city lot for the price of $1500, all of which was payable in thirty days, but which the plaintiff did not accept, and on the contrary the plaintiff entered into another and different contract with one Campbell, whereby he agreed to pixrchase the same property from Campbell as an individual for $1400, one half payable in cash and the remainder in two notes each for the sum of $350, no liability under the latter contract attached to the Georgia Development Company; and the court did not err in sustaining a general demurrer striking that company from the suit.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. W. O. Dean, for plaintiff. Green & Michael, for defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

149 S.E. 559, 169 Ga. 44, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-v-georgia-development-co-ga-1929.