Phillips v. Francis
This text of Phillips v. Francis (Phillips v. Francis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6596
DEREK PHILLIPS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
JOYCE FRANCIS, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:06-cv-00159-FPS-JES)
Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 26, 2009
Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Derek Phillips, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Derek Phillips, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Phillips v. Francis, No. 5:06-cv-00159-
FPS-JES (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 23, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Phillips v. Francis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-v-francis-ca4-2009.