Phillips v. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co.

13 S.E. 644, 87 Ga. 272, 1891 Ga. LEXIS 149
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 27, 1891·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Simmons, J.

The facts of this case will be found in the official report. Under these facts the court did right in granting a nonsuit in the case. It was gross negligence on the part of two females to attempt to walk upon a trestle one hundred and fifty yards long and from twelve to fifteen feet high, near the time when a train was due, it further appearing that the servants of the railroad company did all that was possible to-be done after they discovered the females on the trestle. Judgment affirmed.

The minor children of Mrs. Phillips, by their guardian, sued the railway company for the homicide of their mother by the running of its train. After the introduction of the evidence for the plaintiffs the court granted a nonsuit, which is assigned as error. The principal witness for the plaintiffs was Mrs. Craig, wliose testimony was, in brief, as follows: Mrs. Phillips was run over and killed by the train of defendant at the north end of a trestle on its road, at about ten o’clock in the morning. She and I had been at the water-tank at the south end of the trestle, and had started back home across the trestle. When we first heard the train we were not frightened, as we thought it would stop for wafer, such being the custom of this train. When we saw it pass the tank we were not walking very fast, but commenced running. As we were nearing the north end of the trestle Mrs. Phillips fell and I tried to assist her to rise, but before I could do so, was myself thrown from the track by the locomotive, and Mrs. Phillips was run over and killed, about one hundred yards north of the tank. The railroad is straight at the place where the killing occurred, and wre could have been seen about one half mile. The train was running very fast, and no whistle was blown [273] or warning given, except that the bell was rung as the engine passed the tank. Mrs. Phillips would not have been hurt if the train had stopped at the tank. The people of the neighborhood were, and had been for a number of years, in the habit of using the trestle as a foot-way, with the knowledge of the railroad authorities and without objection. "We took the precaution to listen before we got on the track, but could not see or hear any train. When we became aware of the approach of the train, we ran as fast as we could and made every effort to get oft’the trestle. We did all we could to save ourselves. They saw her in time to stop the train before she was killed. We could have gone to the tank by another way. I lived near the railroad ; Mrs. Phillips lived in Chattanooga, but was at my house on a visit. I do not know how often trains passed on the road. Wo-did not consider ourselves in danger, as we had been on the trestle often before. Mrs. Phillips had the same chance I had to get off the trestle, if she had not fallen. I do not remember how far the engine ran after it struck Mrs. Phillips ; and do not know that I heard the train coming, from the fact of water running over the dam and the noise the tank engine was making. We were going in the. same direction as the train and had our backs to it; and I do not remember how far the train was from us when I first saw it. Do not think it was down grade. At the time of and before this accident there were no notices put up by defendant forbidding people to walk along its road. I had Mrs. Phillips by the hand; she did not- get loose from me until she fell at the end of the trestle, nor did she stoop down or stop until she fell. We were probably half way on the trestle when we first saw and heard the train coming; did not have any thought of a train coming on the road so soon; believed we had plenty of time to cross the trestle before the coming of the train; the [274] reason we thought it would be safe for us to pass over the trestle was, we did not see or hear any train approaching. ¥e did not know what time the train was due at Sugar Valley, a station near by, and did not know that it was behind time. The trestle is a long one and is about fifteen feet high. The ground is not soft and marshy along the trestle ; there was some grass growing there. We did not have plenty of time to get oil the trestle after we first heard the train. I suppose the train did not at all times stop at that tank, but I had seen it stop there often. Do not think the train rolled far after striking Mrs. Phillips.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Phillips v. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co., 13 S.E. 644, 87 Ga. 272, 1891 Ga. LEXIS 149 (Ga. 1891).

13 S.E. 644 (Phillips v. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Munger v. Central of Georgia Railroad
404 S.E.2d 647 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1991)
Goswick v. Western & Atlantic Railroad
187 S.E. 205 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. Wyette
91 S.E. 69 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)
Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Tapley
89 S.E. 841 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)
Provost v. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad
52 La. Ann. 1894 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1900)