Phillips v. Currie Mills, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Phillips v. Currie Mills, Inc.

209 S.E.2d 886, 24 N.C. App. 143, 1974 N.C. App. LEXIS 1958

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedDecember 4, 1974

DocketNo. 7419SC803

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 209 S.E.2d 886 (Phillips v. Currie Mills, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Phillips v. Currie Mills, Inc., 209 S.E.2d 886, 24 N.C. App. 143, 1974 N.C. App. LEXIS 1958 (N.C. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

MARTIN, Judge.

G.S. 1-83 (2) provides that the court may change the place of trial “[w]hen the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice would be promoted by the change.” A motion for change of venue for the convenience of witnesses and to. promote the ends of justice is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial judge, and his action thereon is not r.eviewable on appeal unless an abuse of discretion is shown. Piner v. Truck Rentals, 10 N.C. App. 742, 179 S.E. 2d 900 (1971).

Appellant has failed to show any abuse of discretion in the trial court’s action.

Affirmed.

Judges Campbell and Moréis concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI