Phillips v. Conte

477 P.2d 42, 3 Wash. App. 631, 1970 Wash. App. LEXIS 1000
CourtCourt of Appeals of Washington
DecidedNovember 16, 1970
DocketNo. 286-3
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 477 P.2d 42 (Phillips v. Conte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Phillips v. Conte, 477 P.2d 42, 3 Wash. App. 631, 1970 Wash. App. LEXIS 1000 (Wash. Ct. App. 1970).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Phillips, is presently serving sentences at the state penitentiary in Walla Walla, Washington, on two separate criminal convictions. His sole chal[632]*632lenge to the legality of the detention is based upon the alleged unconstitutional sentencing procedure employed pursuant to chapter 114, Laws of 1935. Petitioner contends by section 4, chapter 34, Laws of 1935, the legislature expressly repealed sections 29 and 30, chapter 249, Laws of 1909, the previous sentencing procedure statute, by reference to their code numbers instead of setting forth the repealed statutes in full in contravention of article 2, section 37 of the Washington State Constitution.

This contention is without merit. The above-referred to portion of the state constitution applies only to amendatory acts by the legislature and not express or implicit repeal. Naccarato v. Sullivan, 46 Wn.2d 67, 278 P.2d 641 (1955); In re Dietrich, 32 Wash. 471, 73 P. 506 (1903). Therefore, petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus is hereby denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Frazier
503 P.2d 1073 (Washington Supreme Court, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
477 P.2d 42, 3 Wash. App. 631, 1970 Wash. App. LEXIS 1000, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-v-conte-washctapp-1970.