Phillips v. Chicago R. I. & P. R.
This text of 257 S.W.2d 864 (Phillips v. Chicago R. I. & P. R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case and the case of Peters v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co., Tex.Civ.App., 257 S.W.2d 860, are companion cases and, by agreement of the parties, were tried, briefed and presented together. The facts and pleadings were the same.
Since the rights of Carl Phillips to recover on his cause of action depend upon the actions of Herschel T. Peters, then the disposition of the Peters case disposes of this case; therefore, the judgment in said case is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
257 S.W.2d 864, 1953 Tex. App. LEXIS 2405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-v-chicago-r-i-p-r-texapp-1953.