Phillips v. Chicago R. I. & P. R.
257 S.W.2d 864, 1953 Tex. App. LEXIS 2405
Opinion
This case and the case of Peters v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co., Tex.Civ.App., 257 S.W.2d 860, are companion cases and, by agreement of the parties, were tried, briefed and presented together. The facts and pleadings were the same.
Since the rights of Carl Phillips to recover on his cause of action depend upon the actions of Herschel T. Peters, then the disposition of the Peters case disposes of this case; therefore, the judgment in said case is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Phillips v. Chicago R. I. & P. R., 257 S.W.2d 864, 1953 Tex. App. LEXIS 2405 (Tex. Ct. App. 1953).
257 S.W.2d 864 (Phillips v. Chicago R. I. & P. R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Peters v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R.
257 S.W.2d 860 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1953)