Phillips v. Centennial Bank
89 So. 3d 1072, 2012 WL 2012119, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8917
This text of 89 So. 3d 1072 (Phillips v. Centennial Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Phillips v. Centennial Bank, 89 So. 3d 1072, 2012 WL 2012119, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8917 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).
Opinion
On Motion for Clarification and/or Certification
We deny appellant’s motion for rehearing but substitute the following for our original opinion of October 19, 2011.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
89 So. 3d 1072, 2012 WL 2012119, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-v-centennial-bank-fladistctapp-2012.