Phillips v. California
386 U.S. 212, 87 S. Ct. 977, 17 L. Ed. 2d 870, 1967 U.S. LEXIS 2146
Opinion
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The •judgment is reversed. Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Phillips v. California, 386 U.S. 212, 87 S. Ct. 977, 17 L. Ed. 2d 870, 1967 U.S. LEXIS 2146 (1967).
386 U.S. 212 (Phillips v. California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Herman Lee Kindred v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2011
Hartley Marine Corp. v. Mierke
474 S.E.2d 599 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1996)
Consolidation Coal Co. v. Department of Treasury
366 N.W.2d 587 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1985)
Department of Revenue v. Air Jamaica Ltd.
455 So. 2d 324 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)
Corning Laboratories, Inc. v. Iowa State Department of Revenue
270 N.W.2d 463 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1978)
Blue Star Line, Inc. v. City & County of San Francisco
77 Cal. App. 3d 429 (California Court of Appeal, 1978)
Rice Growers' Ass'n of California v. County of Yolo
17 Cal. App. 3d 227 (California Court of Appeal, 1971)
Mittelman v. Seifert
17 Cal. App. 3d 51 (California Court of Appeal, 1971)
Southern Pacific Equipment Co. v. State Board of Equalization
16 Cal. App. 3d 302 (California Court of Appeal, 1971)
American President Lines, Ltd. v. Franchise Tax Board
3 Cal. App. 3d 587 (California Court of Appeal, 1970)
Montgomery Ward & Co. v. State Board of Equalization
272 Cal. App. 2d 728 (California Court of Appeal, 1969)
People v. De Santiago
453 P.2d 353 (California Supreme Court, 1969)