Phillips v. California

386 U.S. 212, 87 S. Ct. 977, 17 L. Ed. 2d 870, 1967 U.S. LEXIS 2146
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 10, 1967
Docket684 M
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 386 U.S. 212 (Phillips v. California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Phillips v. California, 386 U.S. 212, 87 S. Ct. 977, 17 L. Ed. 2d 870, 1967 U.S. LEXIS 2146 (1967).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The •judgment is reversed. Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18.

Mr. Justice Black and'Mr. Justice Clark are of the opinion that the judgment should be vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, supra. Mr. Justice Harlan would affirm the judgment below for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in Chapman v. California, supra, at 45.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Herman Lee Kindred v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2011
Hartley Marine Corp. v. Mierke
474 S.E.2d 599 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1996)
Consolidation Coal Co. v. Department of Treasury
366 N.W.2d 587 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1985)
Department of Revenue v. Air Jamaica Ltd.
455 So. 2d 324 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)
Corning Laboratories, Inc. v. Iowa State Department of Revenue
270 N.W.2d 463 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1978)
Blue Star Line, Inc. v. City & County of San Francisco
77 Cal. App. 3d 429 (California Court of Appeal, 1978)
Rice Growers' Ass'n of California v. County of Yolo
17 Cal. App. 3d 227 (California Court of Appeal, 1971)
Mittelman v. Seifert
17 Cal. App. 3d 51 (California Court of Appeal, 1971)
Southern Pacific Equipment Co. v. State Board of Equalization
16 Cal. App. 3d 302 (California Court of Appeal, 1971)
American President Lines, Ltd. v. Franchise Tax Board
3 Cal. App. 3d 587 (California Court of Appeal, 1970)
Montgomery Ward & Co. v. State Board of Equalization
272 Cal. App. 2d 728 (California Court of Appeal, 1969)
People v. De Santiago
453 P.2d 353 (California Supreme Court, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
386 U.S. 212, 87 S. Ct. 977, 17 L. Ed. 2d 870, 1967 U.S. LEXIS 2146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-v-california-scotus-1967.