Phillips v. Browne

Eleventh Circuit

Phillips v. Browne

669 F. App'x 971

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedOctober 19, 2016

DocketNo. 16-11573 Non-Argument Calendar

StatusPublished

This text of 669 F. App'x 971 (Phillips v. Browne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Phillips v. Browne, 669 F. App'x 971 (11th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jim Browne, a law enforcement officer, appeals the District Court’s March 9, 2016, order denying his motion for summary judgment—based on the defense of qualified immunity—on Gina Marea Phillips’s claims of excessive force and unlawful seizure brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Doc. 33. After reading the parties’ briefs and the record before the District Court, we find no basis for disturbing the Court’s order.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Jim Browne, a law enforcement officer, appeals the District Court’s March 9, 2016, order denying his motion for summary judgment—based on the defense of qualified immunity—on Gina Marea Phillips’s claims of excessive force and unlawful seizure brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Doc. 33. After reading the parties’ briefs and the record before the District Court, we find no basis for disturbing the Court’s order.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

669 F. App'x 971, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-v-browne-ca11-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack