Phillips v. Borough of East Paterson

50 A.2d 869, 135 N.J.L. 203, 1947 N.J. LEXIS 199
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 17, 1947
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 50 A.2d 869 (Phillips v. Borough of East Paterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Phillips v. Borough of East Paterson, 50 A.2d 869, 135 N.J.L. 203, 1947 N.J. LEXIS 199 (N.J. 1947).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Donges, Heher, Wachenfeld, Eastwood, Wells, Rafferty, Dill, Freund, McLean, JJ. 11.

For reversal — Perskie, Colie, McGeehan, JJ. 3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

BD., COM'RS, RIDGEFIELD PK. v. AS Pater Realty Co.
179 A.2d 169 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1962)
Antonelli Construction, Inc. v. Milstead
112 A.2d 608 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Adams Theatre Co. v. Keenan
96 A.2d 519 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 A.2d 869, 135 N.J.L. 203, 1947 N.J. LEXIS 199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-v-borough-of-east-paterson-nj-1947.