Phillips v. Borough of East Paterson
50 A.2d 869, 135 N.J.L. 203, 1947 N.J. LEXIS 199
Opinion
The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Donges, Heher, Wachenfeld, Eastwood, Wells, Rafferty, Dill, Freund, McLean, JJ. 11.
For reversal — Perskie, Colie, McGeehan, JJ. 3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Phillips v. Borough of East Paterson, 50 A.2d 869, 135 N.J.L. 203, 1947 N.J. LEXIS 199 (N.J. 1947).
50 A.2d 869 (Phillips v. Borough of East Paterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
BD., COM'RS, RIDGEFIELD PK. v. AS Pater Realty Co.
179 A.2d 169 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1962)
Antonelli Construction, Inc. v. Milstead
112 A.2d 608 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Adams Theatre Co. v. Keenan
96 A.2d 519 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1953)