Phillips v. Blasenheim

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Phillips v. Blasenheim

29 A.D.2d 958, 290 N.Y.S.2d 558, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4279

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 8, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 29 A.D.2d 958 (Phillips v. Blasenheim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Phillips v. Blasenheim, 29 A.D.2d 958, 290 N.Y.S.2d 558, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4279 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated May 31, 1967, affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. No opinion. The pleadings are deemed amended so as to include Park Row. Associates, Phillips Construction Co., Inc., Dorald Engineering Co. and Phillips-Dorald (Joint Venture) as parties plaintiff. Respondents’ renewed motion to dismiss the appeal of certain of the defendants (renewed in respondents’ brief) denied. To the extent that these defendants were ordered to participate in an accounting and retransfer of property they are under a compulsion to do something and this is sufficient to give them an aggrieved status. We express no opinion as to what the Referee may ultimately decide should be the final form of relief among the parties. Beldock, P.' J., Christ, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated May 31, 1967, affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. No opinion. The pleadings are deemed amended so as to include Park Row. Associates, Phillips Construction Co., Inc., Dorald Engineering Co. and Phillips-Dorald (Joint Venture) as parties plaintiff. Respondents’ renewed motion to dismiss the appeal of certain of the defendants (renewed in respondents’ brief) denied. To the extent that these defendants were ordered to participate in an accounting and retransfer of property they are under a compulsion to do something and this is sufficient to give them an aggrieved status. We express no opinion as to what the Referee may ultimately decide should be the final form of relief among the parties. Beldock, P.' J., Christ, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 A.D.2d 958, 290 N.Y.S.2d 558, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-v-blasenheim-nyappdiv-1968.