Phillips v. B. F. Goodrich Co.
172 A.D. 925, 157 N.Y.S. 1142
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The order is not sufficiently broad to permit the plaintiff to be examined concerning specific convictions, as it does not contemplate the taking of illegal evidence. (Oakes v. Star Co., 119 App. Div. 358.) Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton, Mills and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Phillips v. B. F. Goodrich Co., 172 A.D. 925, 157 N.Y.S. 1142 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).
172 A.D. 925 (Phillips v. B. F. Goodrich Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Oakes v. Star Co.
119 A.D. 358 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)