Phillips v. Armellini Express Lines

478 So. 2d 888, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2646, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17046
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 27, 1985·No. No. BC-404·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find there is competent substantial evidence to support the deputy commissioner’s order denying the appellant’s claim for attendant care and therefore affirm. Silver Springs Sportswear v. Martin, 389 So.2d 702 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).

On cross appeal, the employer and carrier attack the deputy’s order with respect to his findings regarding the claim for a swimming pool. Inasmuch as the order contemplates a further hearing on the swimming pool claim before adjudication thereof, such issue is not ripe for determination. We may, therefore, not consider the swimming pool issue until and unless an appeal is taken from a final order thereon.

AFFIRMED.

BOOTH, C.J., and NIMMONS and ZEH-MER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Phillips v. Armellini Express Lines, 478 So. 2d 888, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2646, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17046 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

478 So. 2d 888 (Phillips v. Armellini Express Lines) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Silver Springs Sportswear v. Marlin
389 So. 2d 702 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)