Phillips v. Allen

41 Pa. 481, 1862 Pa. LEXIS 46
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 4, 1862·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered,

by Read, J.

There was no enactment by the legislature expressly authorizing the forfeiture of the baskets, or other articles not stamped or marked according to the provisions of an ordinance of* the city of Philadelphia, of the 1st October 1858; and this being the case, the Select and Common Councils have no power to inflict any such punishment in this form. They may impose fines, or penalties, or pecuniary forfeitures, which are simply penalties, and their recovery is authorized by the Acts of the 15th April 1885, 29th June 1839, and 11th March 1846.

A corporation, created by act of parliament, cannot make such a law, unless the power be especially given by the act: 2 Kyd on Corporations 110 ; and in general the rule is, that a bylaw, without an express act of parliament, can only be enforced by a pecuniary penalty, which must be certain: Grant on Corporations 84. We think this power should be given to the city of Philadelphia.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Phillips v. Allen, 41 Pa. 481, 1862 Pa. LEXIS 46 (Pa. 1862).

41 Pa. 481 (Phillips v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dennis v. Mayor of Rockville
406 A.2d 284 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1979)
March v. Fairmount Creamery Ass'n
32 Pa. Super. 517 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1907)