Phillips v. Abbasi

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 6, 2003
Docket02-7507
StatusUnpublished

This text of Phillips v. Abbasi (Phillips v. Abbasi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Phillips v. Abbasi, (4th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7507

MICKEY L. PHILLIPS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GOHAR ABBASI, Medical Doctor,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

G. MARSHAL, Head Nurse; MRS. CROCKETT, EMT,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-383-3)

Submitted: December 19, 2002 Decided: January 6, 2003

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mickey L. Phillips, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Jones Blain, HARMAN, CLAYTOR, CORRIGAN & WELLMAN, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Mickey L. Phillips seeks to appeal from the magistrate judge’s

report and recommendation issued in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000)

action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and

collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b);

Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The

order Phillips seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an

appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we grant

Appellee’s motion to dismiss and dismiss the appeal for lack of

jurisdiction. We deny Phillips’ motion for appointment of counsel.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Phillips v. Abbasi, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-v-abbasi-ca4-2003.