Phillips, Sherron Dondriel

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 17, 2014
DocketWR-82,437-01
StatusPublished

This text of Phillips, Sherron Dondriel (Phillips, Sherron Dondriel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Phillips, Sherron Dondriel, (Tex. 2014).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-82,437-01

EX PARTE SHERRON DONDRIEL PHILLIPS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. CR-566-12-D(1) IN THE 206TH DISTRICT COURT FROM HIDALGO COUNTY

Per curiam.

ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of

marihuana and sentenced to forty-two months’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

In a single ground, Applicant contends that the Board of Pardons and Paroles’ written notice

of its decision not to release him to parole violates due process. See TEX . GOV ’T CODE § 508.1411.

We order that this application be filed and set for submission to determine the following questions:

(1) whether an applicant who contends that under § 508.1411 the Board of Pardons and Paroles’ 2

written notice violates the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution has an adequate

remedy on habeas when there is not a presumption of release to parole;1 (2) assuming for the sake

of argument that an applicant does have an adequate remedy on habeas, whether § 508.1411

implicates due process and the written notice provided by the Board of Pardons and Paroles satisfies

due process; and (3) whether an application for a writ of mandamus is the proper remedy for such

claims. The parties shall brief these issues. The Board of Pardons and Paroles is invited to submit

a brief.

The trial court shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If he is indigent and desires

to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent him. TEX . CODE

CRIM . PROC. art 26.04. The trial court shall send to this Court, within 60 days of the date of this

order, a supplemental transcript containing either the order appointing counsel or a statement that

Applicant is not indigent. All briefs shall be filed with this Court within 90 days of the date of this

order.

Filed: December 17, 2014 Do not publish

1 See Ex parte Geiken, 28 S.W.3d 553, 558 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000); TEX . GOV ’T CODE § 508.141(a).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Geiken
28 S.W.3d 553 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2000)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Phillips, Sherron Dondriel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-sherron-dondriel-texcrimapp-2014.