Phillips, Ronald v. State

Opinion

Affirmed and Opinion filed May 16, 2002

Affirmed and Opinion filed May 16, 2002.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NOS. 14-01-01127-CR;

          14-01-01128-CR;

          14-01-01129-CR;

          14-01-01130-CR;

          14-01-01131-CR;

         14-01-01132-CR

____________

RONALD PHILLIPS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 182nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 872,496; 872,518; 872,477; 872,519; 872,537; 872,553

M E M O R A N D U M  O P I N I O N

Appellant entered a plea of guilty to six counts of aggravated robbery.  On October  3, 2001, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for thirty-five years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.  Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal.

Appellant's appointed counsel filed briefs in which he concludes that these appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit.  The briefs meet the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.  See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

A copy of counsel=s briefs were delivered to appellant.  Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response.  As of this date, no pro se response has been filed.

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel=s briefs and agree that the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit.  Further, we find no reversible error in the record.  A discussion of the briefs would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state.

Accordingly, the judgments of the trial court are affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Opinion filed May 16,2002.

Panel consists of Justices Yates, Seymore, and Guzman.

Do not publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.3(b).