Phillips, Ronald v. State
This text of Phillips, Ronald v. State (Phillips, Ronald v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed and Opinion filed May 16, 2002.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NOS. 14-01-01127-CR;
14-01-01128-CR;
14-01-01129-CR;
14-01-01130-CR;
14-01-01131-CR;
14-01-01132-CR
RONALD PHILLIPS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 182nd District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause Nos. 872,496; 872,518; 872,477; 872,519; 872,537; 872,553
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Appellant entered a plea of guilty to six counts of aggravated robbery. On October 3, 2001, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for thirty-five years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal.
Appellant's appointed counsel filed briefs in which he concludes that these appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The briefs meet the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
A copy of counsel=s briefs were delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. As of this date, no pro se response has been filed.
We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel=s briefs and agree that the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record. A discussion of the briefs would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state.
Accordingly, the judgments of the trial court are affirmed.
PER CURIAM
Judgment rendered and Opinion filed May 16,2002.
Panel consists of Justices Yates, Seymore, and Guzman.
Do not publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.3(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Phillips, Ronald v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-ronald-v-state-texapp-2002.