Phillips, Preston Foster

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 22, 2012
DocketWR-77,974-02
StatusPublished

This text of Phillips, Preston Foster (Phillips, Preston Foster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Phillips, Preston Foster, (Tex. 2012).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NOS. WR-77,974-01 & WR-77,974-02
EX PARTE PRESTON FOSTER PHILLIPS, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. 6134 & 6135 IN THE 121ST DISTRICT COURT

FROM TERRY COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of forgery and sentenced to twenty years' imprisonment in each cause.

Applicant contends, inter alia, that trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to timely convey a pre-indictment plea offer of twenty months' state jail.

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Lemke, 13 S.W.3d 791 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001); Lafler v. Cooper, 132 S.Ct. 1376 (2012); Missouri v. Frye, 132 S.Ct. 1399 (2012). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings as to whether the State offered a plea deal for twenty months' state jail, and if so, whether counsel timely conveyed that offer to Applicant. The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the performance of Applicant's trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel's deficient performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.



Filed: August 22, 2012

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Lafler v. Cooper
132 S. Ct. 1376 (Supreme Court, 2012)
Missouri v. Frye
132 S. Ct. 1399 (Supreme Court, 2012)
Ex Parte Rodriguez
334 S.W.2d 294 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1960)
Ex Parte Lemke
13 S.W.3d 791 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2000)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Phillips, Preston Foster, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-preston-foster-texcrimapp-2012.