Phillips Petroleum Company v. Carlyle Reynolds Phillips Petroleum Company v. Arthur Wiscombe

230 F.2d 953
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided August 5, 1955·No. 4879-4906_1·Published

Opinion

230 F.2d 953

PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY,
v.
Carlyle REYNOLDS et al.
PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY
v.
Arthur WISCOMBE et al.

Nos. 4877, 4879-4906.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

Aug. 5. 1955.

Rayburn L. Foster, Harry D. Turner, George L. Sneed and James G. Williams, Jr., Bartlesville, Okl., and Clair M. Senior, Salt Lake City, Utah, for appellant.

Olin Wellborn, III, Vernon Barrett, and Frank C. Hubbard, Los Angeles, Cal., Ray Dillman and R. Earl Dillman, Roosevelt, Utah, and Hugh W. Colton, Vernal, Utah, for appellees.

Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and HUXMAN and MURRAH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Judgments reversed and remanded, pursuant to stipulation on authority of cases, Phillips Petroleum Company v. Heber A. Peterson (Phillips Petroleum Company v. Haslem), 10 Cir., 218 F.2d 926.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Phillips Petroleum Company v. Carlyle Reynolds Phillips Petroleum Company v. Arthur Wiscombe, 230 F.2d 953 (10th Cir. 1955).

230 F.2d 953 (Phillips Petroleum Company v. Carlyle Reynolds Phillips Petroleum Company v. Arthur Wiscombe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related