Phillips Petroleum Company v. Carlyle Reynolds Phillips Petroleum Company v. Arthur Wiscombe
This text of 230 F.2d 953 (Phillips Petroleum Company v. Carlyle Reynolds Phillips Petroleum Company v. Arthur Wiscombe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY,
v.
Carlyle REYNOLDS et al.
PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY
v.
Arthur WISCOMBE et al.
Nos. 4877, 4879-4906.
United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.
Aug. 5. 1955.
Rayburn L. Foster, Harry D. Turner, George L. Sneed and James G. Williams, Jr., Bartlesville, Okl., and Clair M. Senior, Salt Lake City, Utah, for appellant.
Olin Wellborn, III, Vernon Barrett, and Frank C. Hubbard, Los Angeles, Cal., Ray Dillman and R. Earl Dillman, Roosevelt, Utah, and Hugh W. Colton, Vernal, Utah, for appellees.
Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and HUXMAN and MURRAH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Judgments reversed and remanded, pursuant to stipulation on authority of cases, Phillips Petroleum Company v. Heber A. Peterson (Phillips Petroleum Company v. Haslem), 10 Cir., 218 F.2d 926.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
230 F.2d 953, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-petroleum-company-v-carlyle-reynolds-phil-ca10-1955.