Phillips-Hall-Synell v. Fannie Mae
This text of Phillips-Hall-Synell v. Fannie Mae (Phillips-Hall-Synell v. Fannie Mae) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
PHILLIPS-HALL-SYNELL, : No. 85 EM 2016 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : FANNIE MAE A/K/A FEDERAL : NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 22nd day of July, 2016, the Application for Extraordinary and
King’s Bench Jurisdiction is DENIED.
Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Phillips-Hall-Synell v. Fannie Mae, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-hall-synell-v-fannie-mae-pa-2016.