Phillipe v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Phillipe v. State

37 So. 3d 301, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 4943, 2010 WL 1460192

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 14, 2010

Docket4D07-4711

StatusPublished

This text of 37 So. 3d 301 (Phillipe v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Phillipe v. State, 37 So. 3d 301, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 4943, 2010 WL 1460192 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is Jean Phillipe’s Anders appeal, which follows his entry of a no contest plea, in lower court case number 06-16791, to charges of possession of cocaine and possession of cannabis with intent to sell and the revocation of his probation in lower court case number 04-12753. Having reviewed the record, we find no issues of arguable merit and thus affirm the judgment and sentence in the 2006 case and the revocation of probation and sentence in the 2004 case. In the 2004 revocation of probation case, however, the trial court failed to enter a written order of revocation, specifying the conditions violated. We therefore remand this case to the trial court for the entry of such an order. See, e.g., Jones v. State, 12 So.3d 320 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).

Affirmed and Remanded.

GROSS, C.J., POLEN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is Jean Phillipe’s Anders appeal, which follows his entry of a no contest plea, in lower court case number 06-16791, to charges of possession of cocaine and possession of cannabis with intent to sell and the revocation of his probation in lower court case number 04-12753. Having reviewed the record, we find no issues of arguable merit and thus affirm the judgment and sentence in the 2006 case and the revocation of probation and sentence in the 2004 case. In the 2004 revocation of probation case, however, the trial court failed to enter a written order of revocation, specifying the conditions violated. We therefore remand this case to the trial court for the entry of such an order. See, e.g., Jones v. State, 12 So.3d 320 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).

Affirmed and Remanded.

GROSS, C.J., POLEN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 So. 3d 301, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 4943, 2010 WL 1460192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillipe-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack