Phillipe v. City of New York Board of Education

254 A.D.2d 339, 678 N.Y.S.2d 662, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10751
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 13, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 254 A.D.2d 339 (Phillipe v. City of New York Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Phillipe v. City of New York Board of Education, 254 A.D.2d 339, 678 N.Y.S.2d 662, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10751 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

[340]*340In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated May 4, 1994, which denied their motion for summary judgment on the complaint and granted the defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and (2) an order of the same court, dated October 9, 1996, which denied their motion for re-argument.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated October 9, 1996, is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying re-argument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated May 4, 1994, is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondents are awarded one bill of costs.

The plaintiffs’ decedent was injured during the course of a spontaneous, pickup football game which took place in the school yard of Intermediate School 383, where he was a student. Inasmuch as the accident occurred before the start of the school day, no duty of supervision had arisen (see, Pratt v Robinson, 39 NY2d 554, 560; Bennett v Board of Educ., 16 AD2d 651). Therefore, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, which was based on a theory of negligent supervision (see, Pratt v Robinson, supra; Bennett v Board of Educ., supra). Rosenblatt, J. P., O’Brien, Sullivan, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ramo v. Serrano
301 A.D.2d 640 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Tarnaras v. Farmingdale School District
264 A.D.2d 391 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Alvero v. Allen
262 A.D.2d 434 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 A.D.2d 339, 678 N.Y.S.2d 662, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10751, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillipe-v-city-of-new-york-board-of-education-nyappdiv-1998.