Phillipe v. American Express Travel Related Services Co.

188 A.D.2d 268
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 1, 1992·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Su[269]*269preme Court, New York County (Carmen Beauchamp Ciparick, J.), entered April 9, 1992, which granted in part defendant’s motion to strike plaintiff’s pre-class certification interrogatories, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

"[F]or the action to proceed as a class action, plaintiffi ] must demonstrate factually that [she] represents] a genuine class * * * and that there is merit to the action on behalf of such class” (Reiken v Nationwide Leisure Corp., 75 AD2d 551, 553; see also, Simon v Cunard Line, 75 AD2d 283, 288). The court properly granted defendant’s motion with respect to those matters not necessary to support plaintiff’s application for class status. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Ross and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Phillipe v. American Express Travel Related Services Co., 188 A.D.2d 268 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

188 A.D.2d 268 (Phillipe v. American Express Travel Related Services Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pesantez v. Boyle Environmental Services, Inc.
251 A.D.2d 11 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)