Phillip Wayne Harris v. David Evans, Commissioner, Lanson Newsome, Deputy Commissioner, A.G. Thomas, Warden

999 F.2d 1424, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 23119, 1993 WL 319328
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedAugust 23, 1993
Docket89-8589
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 999 F.2d 1424 (Phillip Wayne Harris v. David Evans, Commissioner, Lanson Newsome, Deputy Commissioner, A.G. Thomas, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Phillip Wayne Harris v. David Evans, Commissioner, Lanson Newsome, Deputy Commissioner, A.G. Thomas, Warden, 999 F.2d 1424, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 23119, 1993 WL 319328 (11th Cir. 1993).

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVTTCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges. *

*1425 BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
999 F.2d 1424, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 23119, 1993 WL 319328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillip-wayne-harris-v-david-evans-commissioner-lanson-newsome-deputy-ca11-1993.