Phillip Wayne Harris v. David Evans, Commissioner, Lanson Newsome, Deputy Commissioner, A.G. Thomas, Warden

Eleventh Circuit

Phillip Wayne Harris v. David Evans, Commissioner, Lanson Newsome, Deputy Commissioner, A.G. Thomas, Warden

999 F.2d 1424, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 23119, 1993 WL 319328

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided August 23, 1993·No. 89-8589·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVTTCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges. *

*1425 BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVTTCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges. *

*1425 BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Phillip Wayne Harris v. David Evans, Commissioner, Lanson Newsome, Deputy Commissioner, A.G. Thomas, Warden, 999 F.2d 1424, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 23119, 1993 WL 319328 (11th Cir. 1993).

Pincite

999 F.2d 1424 (Phillip Wayne Harris v. David Evans, Commissioner, Lanson Newsome, Deputy Commissioner, A.G. Thomas, Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related