Phillip Wayne Crawford v. the State of Texas
This text of Phillip Wayne Crawford v. the State of Texas (Phillip Wayne Crawford v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-24-00195-CR No. 07-24-00196-CR
PHILLIP WAYNE CRAWFORD, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 181st District Court Randall County, Texas Trial Court Nos. 32467-B & 33745-B, Honorable Titiana Frausto, Presiding
January 14, 2025 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and DOSS, JJ.
Appellant, Philip Wayne Crawford, appeals his convictions for assault on a public
servant 1 and assault on a peace officer. 2 Appellant’s brief was originally due October 28,
2024, but we granted Appellant’s appointed counsel two extensions to file a brief. By
letter of December 11, 2024, we admonished Appellant’s counsel that no further
1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.01(b)(1).
2 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.01(b–2). extensions would be granted and that failure to file a brief by December 23 would result
in the appeals being abated and the causes remanded to the trial court for further
proceedings without further notice. On January 6, 2025, Appellant’s counsel filed a third
motion requesting an extension to January 22 to file a brief.
We deny Appellant’s third motion for extension, abate the appeals, and remand
the causes to the trial court for further proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3).
Upon remand, the trial court shall determine the following:
1. whether Appellant still desires to prosecute the appeals;
2. whether Appellant is indigent;
3. why a timely appellate brief has not been filed on behalf of Appellant;
4. whether Appellant has been denied the effective assistance of counsel;
5. whether new counsel should be appointed; and
6. if Appellant desires to continue the appeals, the date the Court may expect Appellant’s brief to be filed.
The trial court is also directed to enter such orders necessary to address the
aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a
supplemental record and cause that record to be filed with this Court by February 13,
2025. If it is determined that Appellant desires to proceed with the appeals, is indigent,
and has been denied the effective assistance of counsel, the trial court may appoint new
counsel; the name, address, email address, phone number, and state bar number of any
newly appointed counsel shall be included in the aforementioned findings.
2 Should Appellant’s counsel file a brief on or before January 31, 2025, he is directed
to immediately notify the trial court of the filing, in writing, whereupon the trial court shall
not be required to take any further action.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Phillip Wayne Crawford v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillip-wayne-crawford-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.