Phillip Warren Roberts v. State

141 S.W.3d 685, 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 4851, 2004 WL 1177218
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 26, 2004·No. 10-04-00023-CR·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Phillip Warren Roberts pleaded guilty to two counts of indecency with a child. Pursuant to a plea agreement, the court deferred an adjudication of guilt and placed Roberts on unadjudicated community supervision for ten years. The court subsequently adjudicated Roberts’s guilt, sentenced him to twenty years’ imprisonment on each count, and ordered the sentences to run consecutively.

Roberts contends in his sole issue that the court erred by adjudicating his guilt for violations which the court had considered in a prior hearing which resulted in a modification of the terms and conditions of his unadjudicated community supervision. This issue concerns the trial court’s determination to proceed with an adjudication of guilt. Article 42.12, section 5(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure prohibits Rob[686]*686erts from raising this issue on appeal. Tex.Code CRiM. PROC. Ann. art. 42.12, § 5(b) (Vernon Supp.2004); Connolly v. State, 983 S.W.2d 738, 741 (Tex.Crim.App.1999); Williams v. State, 592 S.W.2d 931, 932-33 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.]1979); Gray v. State, 134 S.W.3d 471, 472 (Tex.App.-Waco 2004, no pet. h.). Thus, we dismiss Roberts’s sole issue.

We affirm the judgment. See Williams, 592 S.W.2d at 933; Gray, 134 S.W.3d at 472-73.

Chief Justice GRAY dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Phillip Warren Roberts v. State, 141 S.W.3d 685, 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 4851, 2004 WL 1177218 (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

141 S.W.3d 685 (Phillip Warren Roberts v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related