Phillip Warren Roberts v. State
This text of 141 S.W.3d 685 (Phillip Warren Roberts v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Phillip Warren Roberts pleaded guilty to two counts of indecency with a child. Pursuant to a plea agreement, the court deferred an adjudication of guilt and placed Roberts on unadjudicated community supervision for ten years. The court subsequently adjudicated Roberts’s guilt, sentenced him to twenty years’ imprisonment on each count, and ordered the sentences to run consecutively.
Roberts contends in his sole issue that the court erred by adjudicating his guilt for violations which the court had considered in a prior hearing which resulted in a modification of the terms and conditions of his unadjudicated community supervision. This issue concerns the trial court’s determination to proceed with an adjudication of guilt. Article 42.12, section 5(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure prohibits Rob[686]*686erts from raising this issue on appeal. Tex.Code CRiM. PROC. Ann. art. 42.12, § 5(b) (Vernon Supp.2004); Connolly v. State, 983 S.W.2d 738, 741 (Tex.Crim.App.1999); Williams v. State, 592 S.W.2d 931, 932-33 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.]1979); Gray v. State, 134 S.W.3d 471, 472 (Tex.App.-Waco 2004, no pet. h.). Thus, we dismiss Roberts’s sole issue.
We affirm the judgment. See Williams, 592 S.W.2d at 933; Gray, 134 S.W.3d at 472-73.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
141 S.W.3d 685, 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 4851, 2004 WL 1177218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillip-warren-roberts-v-state-texapp-2004.