Phillip Wallace v. Merle D. Robinson, Zenon Symanski, Michael O'Leary and Michael P. Lane
Opinion
ORDER
On consideration of the petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc and of the response filed thereto in the above-entitled cause, a vote of the active judges of the court was requested. A majority of the judges voted to rehear this case en banc. 2 Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that rehearing en banc be, and the same is hereby, GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the opinion entered in this case on September 26, 1990 be, and is hereby, VACATED. This case will be reheard en banc at the convenience of the court.
. Honorable Richard D. Cudahy, Circuit Judge, voted to deny rehearing en banc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
922 F.2d 409 (Phillip Wallace v. Merle D. Robinson, Zenon Symanski, Michael O'Leary and Michael P. Lane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.