Phillip Wallace v. Merle D. Robinson, Zenon Symanski, Michael O'Leary and Michael P. Lane

Seventh Circuit

Phillip Wallace v. Merle D. Robinson, Zenon Symanski, Michael O'Leary and Michael P. Lane

922 F.2d 409, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 258, 1991 WL 1980

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

DecidedJanuary 9, 1991

Docket88-1806

StatusPublished

This text of 922 F.2d 409 (Phillip Wallace v. Merle D. Robinson, Zenon Symanski, Michael O'Leary and Michael P. Lane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Phillip Wallace v. Merle D. Robinson, Zenon Symanski, Michael O'Leary and Michael P. Lane, 922 F.2d 409, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 258, 1991 WL 1980 (7th Cir. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

On consideration of the petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc and of the response filed thereto in the above-entitled cause, a vote of the active judges of the court was requested. A majority of the judges voted to rehear this case en banc. 2 Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that rehearing en banc be, and the same is hereby, GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the opinion entered in this case on September 26, 1990 be, and is hereby, VACATED. This case will be reheard en banc at the convenience of the court.

2

. Honorable Richard D. Cudahy, Circuit Judge, voted to deny rehearing en banc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

On consideration of the petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc and of the response filed thereto in the above-entitled cause, a vote of the active judges of the court was requested. A majority of the judges voted to rehear this case en banc. 2 Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that rehearing en banc be, and the same is hereby, GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the opinion entered in this case on September 26, 1990 be, and is hereby, VACATED. This case will be reheard en banc at the convenience of the court.

2

. Honorable Richard D. Cudahy, Circuit Judge, voted to deny rehearing en banc.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

922 F.2d 409, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 258, 1991 WL 1980, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillip-wallace-v-merle-d-robinson-zenon-symanski-michael-oleary-and-ca7-1991.