Phillip Vallejo and Brenda Vallejo v. City of Kennedale
Opinion
|
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH |
NO. 02-10-00430-CV
|
Phillip Vallejo and Brenda Vallejo |
APPELLANTS AND APPELLEES |
|
|
V. |
||
|
City of Kennedale |
APPELLEE AND APPELLANT |
|
------------
FROM THE 96th District Court OF Tarrant COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT
We have considered the parties’ “Agreed Motion To Dismiss Appeal And Cross Appeal.” It is the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeals. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).
Costs of the appeals shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: WALKER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.
DELIVERED: May 12, 2011
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Phillip Vallejo and Brenda Vallejo v. City of Kennedale (Phillip Vallejo and Brenda Vallejo v. City of Kennedale) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.