Phillip Sueoka v. the State of Texas
This text of Phillip Sueoka v. the State of Texas (Phillip Sueoka v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 9, 2024
NO. 03-23-00475-CR
Phillip Sueoka, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND KELLY AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER
This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed
the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the
judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Appellant shall
pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below. TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-23-00476-CR
APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND KELLY AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER
This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed
the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the
judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Appellant shall
pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below. TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-23-00477-CR
APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND KELLY AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER
This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed
the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the
judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Appellant shall
pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below. TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-23-00478-CR
APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND KELLY AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER
This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed
the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the
judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Appellant shall
pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below. TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-23-00479-CR
APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND KELLY AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER
This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed
the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the
judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Appellant shall
pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below. TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-23-00480-CR
APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND KELLY AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER
This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed
the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the
judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Appellant shall
pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below. TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-23-00481-CR
APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND KELLY AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER
This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed
the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the
judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Appellant shall
pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Phillip Sueoka v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillip-sueoka-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.