Phillip Sueoka v. the State of Texas

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 9, 2024

NO. 03-23-00475-CR

Phillip Sueoka, Appellant v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND KELLY AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Appellant shall

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 9, 2024

NO. 03-23-00476-CR

Phillip Sueoka, Appellant v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND KELLY AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Appellant shall

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 9, 2024

NO. 03-23-00477-CR

Phillip Sueoka, Appellant v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND KELLY AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Appellant shall

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 9, 2024

NO. 03-23-00478-CR

Phillip Sueoka, Appellant v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND KELLY AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Appellant shall

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 9, 2024

NO. 03-23-00479-CR

Phillip Sueoka, Appellant v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND KELLY AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Appellant shall

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 9, 2024

NO. 03-23-00480-CR

Phillip Sueoka, Appellant v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND KELLY AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Appellant shall

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 9, 2024

NO. 03-23-00481-CR

Phillip Sueoka, Appellant v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND KELLY AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Appellant shall