Phillip Sensinger v. Mary Jane Sensinger

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 9, 2003
Docket13-02-00451-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Phillip Sensinger v. Mary Jane Sensinger (Phillip Sensinger v. Mary Jane Sensinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Phillip Sensinger v. Mary Jane Sensinger, (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

                                   NUMBER 13-02-451-CV

                             COURT OF APPEALS

                   THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                CORPUS CHRISTI

___________________________________________________________________

PHILLIP SENSINGER,                                                             Appellant,

                                                   v.

MARY JANE SENSINGER,                                                       Appellee.

___________________________________________________________________

                        On appeal from the 347th District Court

                                  of Nueces County, Texas.

___________________________________________________________________

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

                 Before Justices Rodriguez, Castillo, and Kennedy[1]

                                       Opinion Per Curiam


Appellant, PHILLIP SENSINGER, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 347th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 01-0419-H.   After the record was filed, the parties filed a joint motion to reverse and remand.  In the motion, the parties state that a successful mediation was reached resolving all matters in controversy made the subject of this litigation.  The parties request that this court reverse and remand these proceedings to the trial court with instructions for the trial court to vacate its prior judgment of May 15, 2002, and enter judgment in accordance with the mediated settlement agreement.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and  the parties= joint motion, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.  The joint motion is granted, and the judgment of the trial court is hereby REVERSED and the cause is REMANDED to the trial court in accordance with the parties= mediated settlement agreement. 

PER CURIAM

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 9th day of January, 2003.



[1]Retired Justice Noah Kennedy assigned to this Court by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Texas pursuant to Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 74.003 (Vernon 1998).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Phillip Sensinger v. Mary Jane Sensinger, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillip-sensinger-v-mary-jane-sensinger-texapp-2003.