Phillip Ray Hebert v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 20, 2010·No. 04-09-00693-CR·Published

Opinion

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00693-CR

Phillip Ray HEBERT, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2007-CR-11352 Honorable Sharon MacRae, Judge Presiding

Sitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 20, 2010

DISMISSED

The trial court’s certification in this appeal states that “this criminal case is a plea-bargain

case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure provides that an appeal “must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has

the right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d).

The clerk’s record, which was filed on CD-ROM, contains a written plea bargain, and the 04-09-00693-CR

punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to

by the defendant; therefore, the clerk’s record supports the trial court’s certification that defendant

has no right of appeal. See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(a)(2). In addition, appellant’s counsel has filed a

letter in which she states that she has reviewed the electronic clerk’s record and “can find no right

of appeal for Appellant;” counsel concedes that the appeal must be dismissed. In light of the record

presented, we agree with appellant’s counsel that Rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss this

appeal. TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d).

DO NOT PUBLISH

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Phillip Ray Hebert v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Phillip Ray Hebert v. State (Phillip Ray Hebert v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.