Phillip Puente v. Richard Stuart
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-25-00341-CV ___________________________
PHILLIP PUENTE, Appellant
V.
RICHARD STUART, Appellee
On Appeal from the 141st District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 141-353047-24
Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal from the trial court’s June 27, 2025
judgment. Appellant also filed a motion for new trial. The trial court granted
appellant’s motion for new trial on August 13, 2025, while the court still had plenary
jurisdiction. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 329b(a), (e).
On August 13, 2025, we informed the parties that the trial court’s new-trial
order rendered this appeal moot, depriving us of jurisdiction, and that the appeal
would be dismissed unless, on or before August 25, 2025, any party desiring to
continue the appeal filed a response showing grounds to continue it. No party filed a
response.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P.
42.3(a), 43.2(f). Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.
Per Curiam
Delivered: September 4, 2025
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Phillip Puente v. Richard Stuart (Phillip Puente v. Richard Stuart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.