Phillip Jackson v. Rufus Oladapo
This text of Phillip Jackson v. Rufus Oladapo (Phillip Jackson v. Rufus Oladapo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ August 06, 2015
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A15I0262. PHILLIP JACKSON v. RUFUS OLADAPO, et al.
Phillip Jackson sued Rufus Oladapo, Danforth, LLC, Amos Ajo, Le Jardin Community Association, Inc., Tapestry at Le Jardin Owners Association, Inc., Giverny at Le Jardin Owners Association, Inc, Community Club Management, Inc., and Diane Clark. On July 14, 2015, the trial court entered one order granting a motion to dismiss filed by Oladapo and Danforth, LLC and a second order granting a motion to dismiss filed by the remaining defendants. The trial court granted certificates of immediate review from both orders, and Jackson filed this application for interlocutory appeal.1 “Pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-54 (b), a direct appeal is proper where the trial court specifically determines that its ruling on a claim is final and that there is no just reason for delay.” Sam’s Wholesale Club v. Riley, 241 Ga. App. 693, 695 (1) (527 SE2d 293) (1999). Here, the trial court’s order contains an express finding that there is no just reason for delay and that its ruling is final. Accordingly, Jackson may appeal the order directly. “This Court will grant a timely application for interlocutory review if the order complained of is subject to direct appeal and the [applicant has] not otherwise filed a notice of appeal.” Spivey v. Hembree, 268 Ga. App. 485, 486 n. 1 (602 SE2d 246) (2004). Accordingly, Jackson’s application for interlocutory appeal is hereby GRANTED. He shall have ten days from the date of this order to file a notice of
1 It appears from the trial court’s certificate of immediate review that a counterclaim remains pending. appeal if he has not already done so. The clerk of the superior court is directed to include a copy of this order in the appeal record transmitted to this Court.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 08/06/2015 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Phillip Jackson v. Rufus Oladapo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillip-jackson-v-rufus-oladapo-gactapp-2015.