Phillip J. Dunn v. Tom Morris, Jr., A/K/A America's Most Wanted

Fourth Circuit

Phillip J. Dunn v. Tom Morris, Jr., A/K/A America's Most Wanted

48 F.3d 1215, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11003, 1995 WL 106188

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 16, 1995·No. 94-7047·Published

Opinion

48 F.3d 1215
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Phillip J. Dunn, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Tom MORRIS, Jr., a/k/a America's Most Wanted, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 94-7047.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 19, 1995.
Decided Feb. 16, 1995.

Philip J. Dunn, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Dunn v. Morris, No. CA-94-882 (E.D. Va. Sept. 14, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

48 F.3d 1215
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Phillip J. Dunn, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Tom MORRIS, Jr., a/k/a America's Most Wanted, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 94-7047.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 19, 1995.
Decided Feb. 16, 1995.

Philip J. Dunn, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Dunn v. Morris, No. CA-94-882 (E.D. Va. Sept. 14, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Phillip J. Dunn v. Tom Morris, Jr., A/K/A America's Most Wanted, 48 F.3d 1215, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11003, 1995 WL 106188 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

48 F.3d 1215 (Phillip J. Dunn v. Tom Morris, Jr., A/K/A America's Most Wanted) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.