Phillip Devonn Smith v. State
This text of Phillip Devonn Smith v. State (Phillip Devonn Smith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-18-00036-CR NO. 09-18-00037-CR ____________________
PHILLIP DEVONN SMITH, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee _______________________________________________________ ______________
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. 13-17281 and 17-27200 ________________________________________________________ _____________
ORDER
Counsel of record for Phillip Devonn Smith filed motions to withdraw as
counsel for the appellant. Although he signed the notices of appeal as counsel of
record for the appellant, counsel informs the Court that he has not been retained as
counsel for the appeals. No information regarding the appellant’s ability to retain
counsel or pay for the record has been provided to this Court.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that the appeals are abated and the cases are
remanded to the trial court for the purpose of determining whether counsel should 1 be allowed to withdraw as counsel on appeal. The trial court shall determine whether
appellant has retained new counsel for the appeals. If the trial court determines that
counsel of record should be allowed to withdraw, and that appellant has not retained
new counsel for the appeals, the trial court shall determine whether the appellant is
indigent for purposes of obtaining a free record on appeal and shall determine
whether counsel should be appointed, in which case the trial court may appoint new
counsel for the appeals unless the trial court admonishes appellant as to the dangers
of self-representation on appeal and determines that appellant’s decision to
relinquish the benefits associated with counsel and to proceed pro se is knowingly
and intelligently made. All appellate timetables are suspended pending resolution of
this matter in the trial court. Supplemental clerk’s records containing any orders and
findings made by the trial court pursuant to this Order, together with a reporter’s
record of any hearings conducted by the trial court, shall be filed with the Court of
Appeals by March 9, 2018.
ORDER ENTERED February 7, 2018.
PER CURIAM
Before Kreger, Horton and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Phillip Devonn Smith v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillip-devonn-smith-v-state-texapp-2018.