Phillip Devonn Smith v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 7, 2018
Docket09-18-00036-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Phillip Devonn Smith v. State (Phillip Devonn Smith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Phillip Devonn Smith v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-18-00036-CR NO. 09-18-00037-CR ____________________

PHILLIP DEVONN SMITH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee _______________________________________________________ ______________

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. 13-17281 and 17-27200 ________________________________________________________ _____________

ORDER

Counsel of record for Phillip Devonn Smith filed motions to withdraw as

counsel for the appellant. Although he signed the notices of appeal as counsel of

record for the appellant, counsel informs the Court that he has not been retained as

counsel for the appeals. No information regarding the appellant’s ability to retain

counsel or pay for the record has been provided to this Court.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that the appeals are abated and the cases are

remanded to the trial court for the purpose of determining whether counsel should 1 be allowed to withdraw as counsel on appeal. The trial court shall determine whether

appellant has retained new counsel for the appeals. If the trial court determines that

counsel of record should be allowed to withdraw, and that appellant has not retained

new counsel for the appeals, the trial court shall determine whether the appellant is

indigent for purposes of obtaining a free record on appeal and shall determine

whether counsel should be appointed, in which case the trial court may appoint new

counsel for the appeals unless the trial court admonishes appellant as to the dangers

of self-representation on appeal and determines that appellant’s decision to

relinquish the benefits associated with counsel and to proceed pro se is knowingly

and intelligently made. All appellate timetables are suspended pending resolution of

this matter in the trial court. Supplemental clerk’s records containing any orders and

findings made by the trial court pursuant to this Order, together with a reporter’s

record of any hearings conducted by the trial court, shall be filed with the Court of

Appeals by March 9, 2018.

ORDER ENTERED February 7, 2018.

PER CURIAM

Before Kreger, Horton and Johnson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Phillip Devonn Smith v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillip-devonn-smith-v-state-texapp-2018.