Phillip Cook v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 22, 2021·No. 20-0740·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D20-740 _____________________________

PHILLIP COOK,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. _____________________________

Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction.

September 22, 2021

PER CURIAM.

The Court denies the petition for writ of certiorari on the merits. See Topps v. State, 865 So. 2d 1253, 1258 (Fla. 2004) (explaining that a decision on an extraordinary writ petition that “clearly shows that the issue was considered by the court on the merits” is deemed a decision “which would later bar the litigant from presenting the issue under the doctrines of res judicata or collateral estoppel”).

LEWIS, MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ., concur. _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Phillip Cook, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee; Rana Wallace, General Counsel, and Mark Hiers, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Commission on Offender Review, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Phillip Cook v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2021).

Phillip Cook v. State of Florida (Phillip Cook v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Topps v. State
865 So. 2d 1253 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)