Phillip Charles Brown v. Baltimore Sun Paper Company Michael J. Davies, Publisher

993 F.2d 1535, 1993 WL 190895
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 4, 1993
Docket93-6226
StatusUnpublished

This text of 993 F.2d 1535 (Phillip Charles Brown v. Baltimore Sun Paper Company Michael J. Davies, Publisher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Phillip Charles Brown v. Baltimore Sun Paper Company Michael J. Davies, Publisher, 993 F.2d 1535, 1993 WL 190895 (4th Cir. 1993).

Opinion

993 F.2d 1535

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Phillip Charles BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BALTIMORE SUN PAPER COMPANY; Michael J. Davies, Publisher,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 93-6226.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 3, 1993
Decided: June 4, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. M. J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-93-187-MJG)

Phillip Charles Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL and HALL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

Phillip Charles Brown appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Brown v. Baltimore Sun Paper Co., No. CA-93-187-MJG (D. Md. Feb. 2, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We hereby deny Brown's motion for judicial relief

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anthony L. Brown v. R. N. Briscoe, Medical Department
993 F.2d 1535 (Fourth Circuit, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
993 F.2d 1535, 1993 WL 190895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillip-charles-brown-v-baltimore-sun-paper-company-michael-j-davies-ca4-1993.