Phillip Chafetz v. Underwriters at Lloyd's London

332 F.2d 152, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 5390
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 13, 1964·No. 20859_1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is by the plaintiff in a suit on a fire insurance policy from a judgment entered on a jury verdict adverse to him. There was sufficient evidence to warrant the submission to the jury of the defense based on the allegation that the fire was of an incendiary origin, and of appellant’s connection thereto. Moreover, there was no error in the charge to the jury, considering it as a whole, with respect to the standard of proof applicable to this defense. Cf. Hanover Fire Insurance Co. of N. Y. v. Argo, 5 Cir., 1958, 251 F.2d 80.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Phillip Chafetz v. Underwriters at Lloyd's London, 332 F.2d 152, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 5390 (5th Cir. 1964).

332 F.2d 152 (Phillip Chafetz v. Underwriters at Lloyd's London) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lancione v. California Union Insurance
382 So. 2d 821 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)