Phillip Caseman v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Opinion

RENDERED: NOVEMBER 7, 2025; 10:00 A.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals

NO. 2024-CA-0921-MR

PHILLIP CASEMAN APPELLANT

APPEAL FROM LEWIS CIRCUIT COURT v. HONORABLE BRIAN C. MCCLOUD, JUDGE CASE NO. 15-CR-00075

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY APPELLEE

OPINION AFFIRMING

** ** ** ** **

BEFORE: CETRULO, KAREM, AND MOYNAHAN, JUDGES.

KAREM, JUDGE: Phillip Caseman, pro se, appeals from a Lewis Circuit Court

order denying his motion to vacate judgment and sentence under Kentucky Rules

of Criminal Procedure (RCr) 11.42. We affirm because Caseman filed his motion

more than three years after the judgment in his case became final. BACKGROUND

Caseman was indicted on multiple charges – including first-degree

rape, sodomy, and incest – for molesting his granddaughter. On October 21, 2020,

he entered a plea of guilty to amended charges of eight counts of first-degree

sexual abuse, five counts of second-degree rape, one count of second-degree

sodomy, one count of tampering with physical evidence, and one count of third-

degree unlawful transaction with a minor. In accordance with the terms of his plea

agreement with the Commonwealth, he was sentenced to twenty years in prison.

Caseman and his wife were looking after their son Bobby’s four

children while Bobby was in prison. According to Caseman, when Bobby was

released from prison, one of the children, a granddaughter, wanted to live with

Bobby, and to obtain that goal, fabricated the charges of sexual misconduct against

him. On May 21, 2024, Caseman filed a pro se RCr 11.42 motion, alleging that his

trial counsel was ineffective for failing to advise him that this alleged motive on

the part of the granddaughter would have constituted a good defense at trial.

The trial court denied the RCr 11.42 motion without a hearing, and

this appeal followed.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

We review a trial court’s decision concerning ineffective assistance of

counsel under RCr 11.42 for abuse of discretion. Jackson v. Commonwealth, 567

-2- S.W.3d 615, 619 (Ky. App. 2019). “The test for abuse of discretion is whether the

trial judge’s decision was arbitrary, unreasonable, unfair, or unsupported by sound

legal principles.” Commonwealth v. English, 993 S.W.2d 941, 945 (Ky. 1999).

ANALYSIS

RCr 11.42(10) contains the following limitations period:

Any motion under this rule shall be filed within three years after the judgment becomes final, unless the motion alleges and the movant proves either:

(a) that the facts upon which the claim is predicated were unknown to the movant and could not have been ascertained by the exercise of due diligence; or

(b) that the fundamental constitutional right asserted was not established within the period provided for herein and has been held to apply retroactively.

The final judgment in this case was entered on October 21, 2020.

Caseman filed his RCr 11.42 motion on May 21, 2024, well beyond the three-year

period permitted under RCr 11.42(10). Bush v. Commonwealth, 236 S.W.3d 621,

623 (Ky. App. 2007) (citations omitted). Neither of the two exceptions in (a) and

(b) that toll the limitations period are applicable. Caseman’s motion and appellate

brief make it clear that he was fully aware of the purported facts underlying his

allegations at the time he was charged. No new constitutional right has been

established which would apply retroactively in this case.

-3- Because Caseman’s motion was filed outside the three-year

limitations period mandated in RCr 11.42(10), and neither of the exceptions apply,

it was insufficient to reinvest the circuit court with jurisdiction. Bush, 236 S.W.3d

at 623 (citation omitted). The circuit court did not abuse its discretion in denying

the motion because it was untimely filed and, as a matter of law, the circuit court

lacked jurisdiction to address the merits of the motion.

CONCLUSION

The order denying Caseman’s RCr 11.42 motion is affirmed.

ALL CONCUR.

BRIEF FOR APPELLANT: BRIEF FOR APPELLEE:

Phillip Caseman, pro se Russell Coleman Burgin, Kentucky Attorney General of Kentucky

Jenny L. Sanders Assistant Attorney General Frankfort, Kentucky

-4-