Phillies v. Harrison/Erickson, Incorporated

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided November 19, 2019·No. 1:19-cv-07239·Unknown

Opinion

DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FIL! IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COU]}} DOC #: FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW Yi} na TE FILED:1 1/19/2019 THE PHILLIES, a Pennsylvania limited partnership, CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-7239-VM-SN Plaintiff, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED HARRISON/ERICKSON, INCORPORATED, a New York corporation, HARRISON ERICKSON, a partnership, and WAYDE HARRISON and BONNIE ERICKSON, Defendants.

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among Plaintiff The Phillies (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Harrison/Erickson, Inc., Harrison Erickson, Wayde Harrison, and Bonnie Erickson (collectively, “Defendants”), as follows: 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Disclosure and discovery activity are likely to arise that may require the disclosure of certain confidential documents and information pertaining to the parties’ trade secrets, confidential financial information, competitive information, personnel information, confidential research, development, manufacturing, financial, process, marketing, and/or business information, or other confidential commercial information within the meaning of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), which requires special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation. Good cause exists to protect this information from public disclosure. In the absence of a suitable protective order safeguarding the

confidentiality of such information, the parties would be hampered in their ability to produce such information. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Stipulated Protective Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection

it affords extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled under the applicable legal principles to treatment as confidential. 2. DEFINITIONS 2.1. Party: Any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, house counsel, corporate parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, consultants, retained experts, and outside counsel (and their support staff). 2.2. Receiving Party: A Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a Producing Party. 2.3. Producing Party: A Party or non-party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in this action.

2.4. Designating Party: A Party or non-party that designates information or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “Confidential.” 2.5. Disclosure or Discovery Material: All items or information, regardless of the medium or manner generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, or tangible things) that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 2.6. “Confidential” Information or Items: Information (regardless of how generated, stored or maintained), documents, or tangible things that the Designating Party reasonably and in good faith believes to contain confidential information within the meaning of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c used by it in, or pertaining to, its business (including its finances and that is not generally known, and which that party would not normally reveal to third parties or, if disclosed, would require such third parties to maintain in confidence. 2.7. Protected Material: Any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as “Confidential.”

2.8. Outside Counsel: Attorneys who are not employees of a Party but who are retained to represent or advise a Party in this action. 2.9. House Counsel: Attorneys who are employees of a Party. 2.10. Expert: An impartial person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the litigation who has been or may be retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this action and who is not a past or a current employee of a Party or a competitor of a Party and who, at the time of retention, is not anticipated to become an employee of a Party or a competitor of a Party. This definition includes a professional jury or trial consultant retained in connection with this litigation.

2.11. Professional Vendors: Persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., photocopying; videotaping; translating; preparing exhibits or demonstratives; organizing, storing, retrieving data in any form or medium; etc.) and their employees and subcontractors. 3. SCOPE The protections conferred by this Stipulated Protective Order cover not only Protected Material (as defined above), but also any information copied or extracted therefrom, as well as all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations thereof, plus testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or counsel to or in court or in other settings that might reveal Protected Material. 4. DURATION Following the conclusion or termination of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this Stipulated Protective Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs. 5. DESIGNATION OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 5.1. Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this

Stipulated Protective Order (see, e.g., second paragraph of Section 5.1(a), below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, material that qualifies for protection under this Stipulated Protective Order must be clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or produced. Designation in conformity with this Stipulated Protective Order requires: (a) For information in documentary form (apart from transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing Party affix the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” on each page that contains Protected Material, unless otherwise agreed upon by the Parties. A Party or non-party that makes original documents or materials available for inspection need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated

which material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed “Confidential.” After the inspecting Party has identified the documents it wants copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents qualify for protection under this Stipulated Protective Order, then, before producing the specified documents, the Producing Party must affix the appropriate legend on each page that contains Protected Material. (b) For testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial proceedings, that the Party or non-party offering or sponsoring the testimony identify by means of a statement on the record before the close of the deposition, hearing, or other proceeding, or by written notice within fourteen (14 days from the date of receipt of the transcript of the testimony, any testimony containing “Confidential” material. Only those portions of the testimony that are appropriately designated for protection within fourteen (14 days from the date of receipt of the transcript of the testimony shall be covered by the provisions of this Stipulated Protective Order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Phillies v. Harrison/Erickson, Incorporated, (S.D.N.Y. 2019).

Phillies v. Harrison/Erickson, Incorporated (Phillies v. Harrison/Erickson, Incorporated) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.