Philips v. Republic Insurance
65 N.Y. 1000
Opinion
[1002] OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (108 AD2d 845). (See also, Dano v Royal Globe Ins. Co., 59 NY2d 827; Hubbell v Trans World Life Ins. Co., 50 NY2d 899.) Insurance Law § 2601 does not require a different result.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Titone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Philips v. Republic Insurance, 65 N.Y. 1000 (N.Y. 1985).
65 N.Y. 1000 (Philips v. Republic Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hubbell v. Trans World Life Ins. Co. of New York
408 N.E.2d 918 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
Dano v. Royal Globe Insurance
451 N.E.2d 488 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
Philips v. Republic Insurance
108 A.D.2d 845 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)