Philips v. Republic Insurance

New York Court of Appeals

Philips v. Republic Insurance

65 N.Y. 1000

DecidedSeptember 10, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 65 N.Y. 1000 (Philips v. Republic Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Philips v. Republic Insurance, 65 N.Y. 1000 (N.Y. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

[1002]*1002OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (108 AD2d 845). (See also, Dano v Royal Globe Ins. Co., 59 NY2d 827; Hubbell v Trans World Life Ins. Co., 50 NY2d 899.) Insurance Law § 2601 does not require a different result.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Titone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[1002]*1002OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (108 AD2d 845). (See also, Dano v Royal Globe Ins. Co., 59 NY2d 827; Hubbell v Trans World Life Ins. Co., 50 NY2d 899.) Insurance Law § 2601 does not require a different result.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Titone.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 N.Y. 1000, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philips-v-republic-insurance-ny-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack