Philips v. Philips

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Philips v. Philips

39 A.D.2d 733, 332 N.Y.S.2d 412, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4680

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 8, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 39 A.D.2d 733 (Philips v. Philips) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Philips v. Philips, 39 A.D.2d 733, 332 N.Y.S.2d 412, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4680 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

In a habeas corpus proceeding concerning custody of a minor child of the parties, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court,. Westchester County, dated December 17, 1971, which inter alia sustained the writ and awarded custody to relator. Order affirmed, without costs. Custodial determination was appropriate to the circumstances of this fact pattern. In addition, counsel fees may be awarded pursuant to subdivision (b) of section 237 of the Domestic Relations Law. Latham, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Gulotta, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a habeas corpus proceeding concerning custody of a minor child of the parties, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court,. Westchester County, dated December 17, 1971, which inter alia sustained the writ and awarded custody to relator. Order affirmed, without costs. Custodial determination was appropriate to the circumstances of this fact pattern. In addition, counsel fees may be awarded pursuant to subdivision (b) of section 237 of the Domestic Relations Law. Latham, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Gulotta, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 A.D.2d 733, 332 N.Y.S.2d 412, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philips-v-philips-nyappdiv-1972.