Philips v. North Carolina State

667 F. App'x 419
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 1, 2016·No. No. 16-1119·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sherif Philips appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Philips v. N.C. State, No 5:15-cv-0095-F, 2015 WL 9462095 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 28, 2015). We deny Philips’ motions to appoint counsel and for consideration of recusal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Philips v. North Carolina State, 667 F. App'x 419 (4th Cir. 2016).

667 F. App'x 419 (Philips v. North Carolina State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Untitled Case
M.D. North Carolina, 2026
Lesane v. Bell
E.D. North Carolina, 2024
Philips v. Berman
D. Guam, 2024