Philips v. North Carolina State
This text of 667 F. App'x 419 (Philips v. North Carolina State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Sherif Philips appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Philips v. N.C. State, No 5:15-cv-0095-F, 2015 WL 9462095 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 28, 2015). We deny Philips’ motions to appoint counsel and for consideration of recusal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
667 F. App'x 419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philips-v-north-carolina-state-ca4-2016.