Philips v. Newell Co.

118 F.3d 972, 1997 WL 424452
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedJuly 30, 1997
DocketNo. 2310, Docket 97-7559
StatusPublished

This text of 118 F.3d 972 (Philips v. Newell Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Philips v. Newell Co., 118 F.3d 972, 1997 WL 424452 (2d Cir. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from Judge Leisure’s denial of a petition to stay arbitration. We affirm for the reasons set forth in his opinion. Application of Carl Philips v. Newell Co., No. 96 CIV. 9153, 1997 WL 181191 (S.D.N.Y. April 15, 1997). The cont entions raised by the appellant for the first time on appeal are without merit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
118 F.3d 972, 1997 WL 424452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philips-v-newell-co-ca2-1997.