Philips v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC

189 So. 3d 944, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9463, 2016 WL 1573976
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 24, 2016
Docket5D15-338
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 189 So. 3d 944 (Philips v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Philips v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, 189 So. 3d 944, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9463, 2016 WL 1573976 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ronald Philips (“Appellant”) appeals the trial court’s entry of final judgment of foreclosure in favor of Nationstar Mortgage, LLC (“Nationstar”). Appellant raises several issues on appeal. We affirm as to all, except for the final judgment’s inclusion of awards regarding specific expenses for which there was no proof. Appellant asserts that there was no evidence presented by Nationstar during the non-jury *945 trial to justify the inclusion of the amounts listed in the final judgment for hazard insurance, property inspections, attorney’s fees, filing fees, service fees, title search costs, and statutory mailing fees.. Commendably, Nationstar concedes this point. We agree that it was error to, include those amounts in the final judgment. “[AJppel-late courts do not generally provide parties with an opportunity to retry their case upon a failure of proof.” Wolkoff v. Am. Home Mortg. Servicing, Inc., 153 So.3d 280, 283 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (alteration in original) (quoting Correa v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass’n, 118 So.3d 952, 956 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013)). Therefore, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand with instructions for the trial court to enter an amended final judgment in favor of Nationstar, which shall exclude any amounts for hazard insurance, property inspections, attorney’s fees, filing fees, service fees, title search costs, and statutory mailing fees, but will otherwise be in accordance with the original final judgment.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS

PALMER, TORPY, AND EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Intego Software, LLC d/b/a Critical Alert v. Concept Development, Inc.
198 So. 3d 887 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
189 So. 3d 944, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9463, 2016 WL 1573976, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philips-v-nationstar-mortgage-llc-fladistctapp-2016.