Philips v. Caswell
4 Cow. 505
Opinion
We think the attorney, in this case, comes within the character of a mere amanuensis for the justice. Such an exception to the rule, established by Fox v. Johnson, was mentioned by the Court; and we think it does not come Avithin the reason of the rule. The motion is denied.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Philips v. Caswell, 4 Cow. 505 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1825).
4 Cow. 505 (Philips v. Caswell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Van Slyke v. Disbrow
117 N.Y.S. 620 (Otsego County Court, 1909)