Philips v. Caswell
4 Cow. 505
This text of 4 Cow. 505 (Philips v. Caswell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Philips v. Caswell, 4 Cow. 505 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1825).
Opinion
We think the attorney, in this case, comes within the character of a mere amanuensis for the justice. Such an exception to the rule, established by Fox v. Johnson, was mentioned by the Court; and we think it does not come Avithin the reason of the rule. The motion is denied.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Van Slyke v. Disbrow
117 N.Y.S. 620 (Otsego County Court, 1909)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 Cow. 505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philips-v-caswell-nysupct-1825.