Philips v. Belfi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Philips v. Belfi

259 A.D.2d 620, 684 N.Y.S.2d 919, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2490

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 259 A.D.2d 620 (Philips v. Belfi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Philips v. Belfi, 259 A.D.2d 620, 684 N.Y.S.2d 919, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2490 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to prohibit the respondents from taking any further acts or proceedings in or in connection with an order of the County Court, Nassau County (Belfi, J.), dated December 4, 1998, which permitted the People of the State of New York to photograph the petitioner’s genitalia.

Adjudged that the petition is denied, without costs or disbursements, and the proceeding is dismissed.

Prohibition does not lie to challenge an order issued pursuant to CPL 240.40 (see, Matter of Anonymous, 76 NY2d 766; see also, Matter of Ford v Vaughan, 196 AD2d 869; Matter of Dunnigan v Weissman, 181 AD2d 731; Matter of Vann v Fried-lander, 170 AD2d 782). Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to prohibit the respondents from taking any further acts or proceedings in or in connection with an order of the County Court, Nassau County (Belfi, J.), dated December 4, 1998, which permitted the People of the State of New York to photograph the petitioner’s genitalia.

Adjudged that the petition is denied, without costs or disbursements, and the proceeding is dismissed.

Prohibition does not lie to challenge an order issued pursuant to CPL 240.40 (see, Matter of Anonymous, 76 NY2d 766; see also, Matter of Ford v Vaughan, 196 AD2d 869; Matter of Dunnigan v Weissman, 181 AD2d 731; Matter of Vann v Fried-lander, 170 AD2d 782). Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D.2d 620, 684 N.Y.S.2d 919, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philips-v-belfi-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack