Philippe v. State

67 So. 3d 427, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12545, 2011 WL 3477068
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 10, 2011·No. 4D10-2364·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s Rule 3.800(a) motion. Brooks v. State, 969 So.2d 238 (Fla.2007). Even if the claim of scoresheet error had been raised in a sworn Rule 3.850 motion, the transcript of the sentencing hearing conclusively shows that the trial court would have imposed the same sentence. Brooks, 969 So.2d at 243 n. 8; State v. Anderson, 905 So.2d 111, 112 (Fla.2005).

Affirmed.

WARNER, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Philippe v. State, 67 So. 3d 427, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12545, 2011 WL 3477068 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

67 So. 3d 427 (Philippe v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Anderson
905 So. 2d 111 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)
Brooks v. State
969 So. 2d 238 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2007)